Compact version |
|
Friday, 29 November 2024 | ||
|
RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 3, No. 3, 00-01-05Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Newsline Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty <http://www.rferl.org>RFE/RL NEWSLINEVol. 3, No. 3, 5 January 2000CONTENTS[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA
[B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
[C] END NOTE
[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA[01] ARSON ATTACK ON ARMENIAN NEWSPAPERThe Yerevan editorialoffice of the Russian-language newspaper "Novoe vremya" was badly damaged in a fire on 31 December, Armenian Television and ITAR-TASS reported on 3 and 4 January. The paper's editor, Ruben Satyan, said he had received telephone threats prior to the arson attack. ITAR-TASS linked the incident to the reprinting in "Novoe vremya" of an article from a Moscow publication concerning the 27 October murder of Armenian Premier Vazgen Sargsian. LF [02] POLICE QUASH PROTESTS IN AZERBAIJANPolice in Azerbaijan'snorthern Belakan Raion, which borders on Georgia, dispersed two demonstrations by several hundred local residents demanding the resignation of local electricity department officials, Turan reported on 29 December and 3 January. Power supplies to Belakan Raion were discontinued around 9 December. LF [03] GEORGIAN PRESIDENTIAL SPOKESMAN DOWNPLAYS CALL FOR ALLOWINGTHIRD PRESIDENTIAL TERMPresidential spokesman Vakhtang Abashidze on 5 January said Tbilisi Mayor Ivane Zodelava's proposal that the Georgian Constitution be amended to allow one individual to serve three, rather than two, consecutive presidential terms was a private initiative of Zodelava, Caucasus Press reported. Zodelava, who made the proposal to parliament the previous day, argued that no realistic opponent will emerge to challenge incumbent Eduard Shevardnadze either in the April 2000 presidential poll or in 2005. Opposition "United Georgia" parliament faction leader Giorgi Targamadze told Caucasus Press on 5 January that Zodelava's proposal amounts to a call for the establishment of a monarchy, and is an insult to both Shevardnadze and the Georgian nation. He said the proposal further shows that Shevardnadze "has failed to prepare a successor during his 13-year rule." LF [04] ABKHAZIA OBJECTS TO UKRAINE'S INCLUSION IN UN MEDIATIONGROUP...The Foreign Ministry of the unrecognized Republic of Abkhazia has issued a statement protesting against Ukraine's incorporation into the semi-formal group of states designated as Friends of the UN Secretary-General, which is charged with mediating a solution to the Abkhaz conflict, Caucasus Press reported on 4 January. The Abkhaz statement said the inclusion of Ukraine in the grouping, which also comprises the U.S., France, the U.K., Germany, and Russia, constitutes a violation of the agreement reached earlier in Geneva on the format for settlement talks. Following Ukraine's accession to the group in December, Ukrainian and Russian Foreign Ministry officials met in Kyiv to discuss Ukraine's possible participation in the CIS peacekeeping force in Georgia. Ukraine had first volunteered to send peacekeepers to Georgia two years ago (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 14 July 1997). LF [05] ...WHICH GEORGIAN ABKHAZ LEADER WANTS AZERBAIJAN TO JOIN ASWELLTamaz Nadareishvili, chairman of the Abkhaz parliament in exile which comprises the ethnic Georgian deputies to the Abkhaz legislature elected in 1991, told Caucasus Press on 5 January that the parliament will send a delegation to Ukraine and Azerbaijan next month to discuss the possible deployment of Ukrainian and Azerbaijani peacekeeping forces along the internal border between Abkhazia and the rest of Georgia. Nadareishvili called for the inclusion of Azerbaijan as well as Ukraine in the Friends of the UN Secretary-General group. LF [06] KAZAKH OPPOSITION POLITICIANS ASSESS PUTIN THREATSpeakingat a press conference in Almaty on 4 January, independent opposition politician Nurlan Amrekulov predicted that acting Russian President Putin will pressure Kazakhstan's leadership to allow Russian businessmen to play a more prominent role in the country's economy, RFE/RL's bureau in the former capital reported. Also on 4 January, Amirzhan Qosanov, a leading member of the Republican People's Party of Kazakhstan, told RFE/RL that he is certain Putin will misrepresent the situation of ethnic Russians in the "near abroad," including northern Kazakhstan, in his presidential election campaign. LF [07] KYRGYZ OPPOSITION PARTY APPEALS ELECTION RESTRICTIONThe El(Bei-Bechara) Party on 4 January appealed to both the Justice Ministry and the Central Electoral Commission to allow it to contend the 15 seats in the lower house of the new Kyrgyz parliament to be elected according to proportional representation on 20 February, RFE/RL's Bishkek bureau reported. The party has lost two court appeals against the CEC's ruling that it may not contest the poll as its founding documents do not list participation in national elections as one of the party's objectives (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 21 December 1999 and 3 January 2000). LF [08] TWO MORE TAJIK PARTIES NOMINATE PARLIAMENTARY CANDIDATESTheDemocratic Party of Tajikistan and the Socialist Party of Tajikistan held congresses on 4 January at which they each selected 22 candidates to contend the 27 February election to the lower chamber of the new parliament under the proportional system, ITAR-TASS and Asia Plus-Blitz reported. The Democratic Party has some 5,000 members and the Socialist Party 30,000. LF [09] PRESIDENT NAMED 'MAN OF THE CENTURY' IN UZBEKISTANIslamKarimov was named Uzbekistan's "Man of the Century" in a poll conducted by the BBC World Service, Interfax reported on 4 January, quoting Uzbek media. On 17 December, Interfax reported that a nationwide Uzbek poll of 6,000 people had also established that Karimov was the country's most popular political figure. Most respondents expressed their intention to vote for Karimov in the 9 January presidential election. LF [B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE[10] CROATIAN OPPOSITION VICTORY CONFIRMEDMarijan Ramuscak, whoheads the state electoral commission, said in Zagreb on 4 January that the main opposition coalition has won in nine out of 10 electoral districts (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 4 January 2000). In the new legislature, the Social Democratic- Social Liberal coalition will have 71 seats, while an allied coalition of four smaller centrist parties will hold 24. The Croatian Democratic Community (HDZ), which has governed since 1990, has been reduced to 40 seats. Four seats will go to far-right parties and one to the tiny Christian Democrats. Ramuscak added that he expects that six legislators will represent the diaspora, which cast 85 percent of its votes for the HDZ. The exact number of diaspora seats will depend on the number of votes cast for the diaspora list. Final returns are expected on 7 January. International and Croatian election monitors reported no serious irregularities. The outgoing government met on 4 January and promised a smooth transition to its successor. PM [11] SERBIAN OPPOSITION HAILS CROATIAN VOTELeading officials ofthe EU and OSCE said on 4 January that the opposition victory will likely lead to greater democracy in Croatia (see "End Note," "RFE/RL Newsline," 4 January 2000). In Belgrade, federal Information Minister Goran Matic said the opposition victory came as no surprise, adding that it will lead to a more pro-Western orientation in Croatian policy. State-run electronic media played down the news from Zagreb, which the regime-controlled daily "Politika" placed on page seven. Opposition spokesman Veran Batic, however, stressed that he hopes the Croatian vote is a harbinger of changes to come in Serbia, the independent daily "Danas" reported. In Podgorica, all parties except those allied to Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic greeted the news from Zagreb, a correspondent of RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported. PM [12] HOPES FOR NEW CROATIAN POLICY IN BOSNIAThe Sarajevo daily"Avaz," which is close to the Muslim leadership, ran the headline on 5 January: "New Croatian government will respect Bosnia as a [sovereign] state." Moderate Bosnian Croat leader Kresimir Zubak said in Sarajevo the previous day that he expects the new government to follow a significantly different policy in Bosnia from that of its predecessor. Former Republika Srpska President Biljana Plavsic said in Banja Luka that she hopes that the new government will break with what she called the "extremist" policies of the HDZ. Croatian Prime Minister designate Ivica Racan told state-run Bosnian radio that his government will have "no double standards and deals made under the table" between the Bosnian Croats and Zagreb. "Bosnian Croats will have to perceive Bosnia as their home...and we will support them in this," AP quoted him as saying. PM [13] SLOVENIA CALLS SELF MODEL FOR CROATIAPrime Minister JanezDrnovsek said in Ljubljana that the Croatian election results were not unexpected and signify the start of a new era for that country, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported on 5 January. He added that Slovenia's experience in democratization and in seeking Euro-Atlantic integration is a good model for Croatia. PM [14] HDZ TO PICK GRANIC FOR PRESIDENCY?The HDZ's presidencynominated moderate Foreign Minister Mate Granic as the party's candidate for the presidency in the 24 January elections. Hard-line candidate Vladimir Seks withdrew his name from the vote, which was 13 for Granic with three invalid ballots, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported on 4 January. The party's steering committee is expected to make the final decision on 5 January. Previous opinion polls suggested that Granic is the only HDZ candidate with a chance of defeating Drazen Budisa, who represents the main opposition coalition. Following the opposition's parliamentary victory, however, Budisa stressed that he is confident that he can defeat Granic. The Zagreb HDZ list that Granic headed in the parliamentary vote was badly defeated by the opposition and took only 21 percent of the vote. PM [15] RIGHTIST LEADER WANTS HDZ LEADERSHIP OUTSpeaking in Osijekon 4 January, far-right HDZ leader Branimir Glavas demanded that the party's 16-member presidency resign following the electoral debacle the previous day. He stressed that a new party congress must be held to select new leaders, primarily from among people active at the local level. Glavas achieved fame as a powerful local warlord in the 1991 conflict with the Serbs in a way that prompted British journalist Misha Glenny to dub him a "serial killer in fatigues." Glavas was subsequently widely known as the only local leader in Croatia who was even feared by late President Franjo Tudjman. PM [16] SERBIA DECLARES FLU EPIDEMICThe Health Ministry announcedin Belgrade on 5 January that influenza has reached "epidemic" proportions in Serbia. The ministry banned visits to flu patients in hospitals, AP reported. More than 10,000 people in Montenegro have also contracted the virus. "Danas" reported an outbreak of hepatitis in the northern Kosova town of Mitrovica. PM [17] ROMANIAN PRESIDENT WANTS 'STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP' WITH ISRAEL,TURKEY...Visiting Romanian President Emil Constantinescu on 4 January told acting Israeli prime minister Itzhak Mordechai that Romania, Israel, and Turkey should set up a "strategic partnership," an RFE/RL correspondent in Jerusalem reported. Mordechai is filling in for Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who is in the U.S. for peace talks with Syria. Mordechai said that during his tenure as defense minister in former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's cabinet, Israel and Romania had intensified military collaboration. Constantinescu also brought up the problems of some 50,000 Romanian workers in Israel, who have often complained about discrimination and poor employment conditions. He proposed a bilateral agreement to allow Romanian and Israeli workers to pay into their pensions while working in the other country. MS [18] ...IS DEFENSIVE ON ANTI-SEMITISM IN ROMANIAMeetingjournalists of the Romanian-language press in Israel, Constantinescu said that certain Romanian political parties, such as the Greater Romania Party, have adopted anti-Semitic postures and that other political groups "openly or covertly collaborate with [such parties] out of electoral considerations or considerations linked with the struggle for power." The comments came one day after Constantinescu described anti-Semitism as a "marginal phenomenon" in Romania (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 4 January 2000). He also admitted that Romania's civil society structures prefer to ignore the phenomenon of xenophobic publications, "believing that if they do so, the phenomenon does not exist," Mediafax reported. Knesset chairman Avraham Burg raised the issue of confiscated Jewish property in Romania with Constantinescu. Constantinescu said the problem must be solved within Romania's general framework for restitution. MS [19] UKRAINE TO CUT OFF ELECTRICITY SUPPLIES TO MOLDOVA?Ukrainehas informed the Moldovan state electricity company that it may soon have to stop electricity deliveries to Moldova due to its own problems with gas deliveries from Russia, an official of the Moldtranselectro company said on 4 January. Moldova recently increased its electricity imports from Ukraine and Romania. The move came after Gazprom drastically reduced gas deliveries to Moldova because Chisinau was unable to meet debt payments. Romania has also warned Moldova that it may cut off electricity supplies on 6 January because Chisinau is failing to make payments on a $10 million debt, ITAR-TASS reported. MS [C] END NOTE[20] Ending 'The Breakup of Russia'By Paul A. GobleVladimir Putin's latest rationale for Moscow's campaign in Chechnya -- to "bring about the end of the breakup of Russia" -- raises some disturbing questions about the kind of policies he may try to pursue as acting president of the Russian Federation. During a visit to Russian-controlled regions of Chechnya on New Year's Day, Putin told Russian soldiers that their campaign against the Chechens is "not simply about restoring honor and dignity to the country." Rather, he continued, "it is about how to bring about the end of the breakup of Russia." Most immediately, these remarks call into question the claims Putin and his supporters have made in the past about this conflict. Until last weekend, he had insisted that the conflict was about extirpating "extremists" and "terrorists," goals which many Western leaders have found difficult to oppose even when they are appalled by the way Russian forces have set about achieving that objective. By shifting his stance so quickly and completely, Putin has unintentionally invited those governments to re-examine both his earlier claims about the conflict and their response to it. And he has equally unintentionally raised questions on only his second day in office as to how reliable a partner he may be in any negotiations with Western governments. But as significant as these consequences may prove in the future, Putin's words on this occasion clearly have even more serious implications for the Russian Federation, for its relationship with its neighbors, and hence for the world as a whole. For the Russian Federation, Putin's new position on Chechnya points to a more authoritarian future, one in which the reconstitution of state authority and the defense of a particular territory takes precedence over any move toward greater freedom and democracy. As all polls show, Putin's popularity in the Russian Federation reflects the longing of many Russians for a stronger and more effective state capable of responding quickly and harshly to any challenge -- be it from often despised ethnic minorities, criminal groups, or Western governments. But a state reconstituted on the basis of such expectations is unlikely to be the peaceful and liberal democratic regime that many in both Russia and the West have been hoping for. Under such leadership, the Russian Federation could become an increasingly authoritarian Rechtstaat, a regime in which the state is capable of enforcing the laws it issues rather than responding to the demands of population in whose name it rules. For many Russians who have lived through the lawlessness of the Yeltsin years as well as for Western business interests there, such a state might appear to be a major improvement on current conditions. But precisely because such a regime is likely to have to seek support through nationalist appeals, it might rapidly become something much less attractive and ever more nationalistic. Should that happen, the Putin government might move on from its current campaign against "persons of the Caucasus nationality" to open and state-sponsored discrimination against other ethnic and religious groups not judged by Putin's brand of Russian nationalists to be truly Russian. For the countries surrounding the Russian Federation -- especially the 11 former Soviet republics and three Baltic countries -- Putin's new position is, if anything, even more threatening. At a minimum, the nationalistic Russia Putin's policies point to almost certainly will be far more difficult to get along with. But many in these countries are likely to be especially concerned that the Russian nationalist resurgence he is sponsoring will not stop at the borders of the Russian Federation. Even the Yeltsin government showed itself willing to exploit the presence of more than 20 million ethnic Russians in these states to pressure them into a special relationship with Moscow. Putin will certainly do no less and is quite likely to do a great deal more, thus further "ethnicizing" politics in many of these countries and undermining stability in some of them. But Putin's words on New Year's Day are potentially more ominous for the non-Russian countries. Many Russians are likely to view his words less as a call to firm up the borders of the Russian Federation, an entity many of them do not see as their country, than as a demand for a revision of the results of 1991. Putin may thus push even harder for a Russian Federation union with Belarus than Yeltsin did and may also put more pressure on the members of the Commonwealth of Independent States to defer to Moscow's interests. Above all, Putin's new stance may pose a major concern for the international community. One of the bases of Putin's popularity has been his willingness, even eagerness, to dismiss Western criticism of his policies in Chechnya, a dismissal underlined by his assertion last month that Russia should not act as if it now has no enemies. Such a leader seems an unlikely candidate for serious talks with the West anytime soon, even though Russia's economic problems may lead him to change his tone at least enough to extract more resources from Western governments who do not want to see the situation in Russia get even worse. But far more than Yeltsin, Putin will find it hard to make any broader deals with the West. And consequently, his words about defending the borders of Russia may have the effect of creating precisely those dividing lines in Europe that leaders in both Moscow and the West have said they hope to avoid. 05-01-00 Reprinted with permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
|